Who we serve
Acute Care & Critical Access Hospitals
Assess physician performance, enhance patient safety, and support continuous quality improvement across the organization.
The challenge
Medical staff committees are asked to evaluate colleagues they work beside every day — often without a same-specialty peer on staff. QPS gives hospitals an independent, specialty-matched reviewer for every case, so findings are credible, defensible and free of conflict of interest.
What we hear most often
- 01No same-specialty peer on the medical staff
- 02Conflicts of interest in small or tightly affiliated communities
- 03Committee workload and review backlogs
- 04Accreditation and CMS Conditions of Participation scrutiny
How QPS helps
Objective, specialty-matched review built around your workflow.
Objective case review
Board-certified reviewers in the same specialty evaluate adverse events, complaints and unexpected outcomes.
OPPE & FPPE support
Standardized evaluations that document provider competence for reappointment and new privileges.
System-level insight
Performance improvement reviews that separate individual performance from process and system factors.
Fair hearing support
Detailed, well-referenced reports and expert support for medical staff appeals.
Recommended services
Comprehensive Review
An in-depth, same-specialty assessment of clinical judgment, quality of care, medical decision-making, documentation and adherence to evidence-based standards.
Learn moreFocused Review
A targeted evaluation of specific aspects of a provider's practice, initiated by a defined concern, event, complaint or quality indicator.
Learn moreOPPE & FPPE
Objective, specialty-specific evaluations that strengthen provider performance programs and help meet HRSA, CMS and accreditation requirements.
Learn morePerformance Improvement
Analysis that goes beyond the individual provider to find why outcomes occurred and which system factors contributed.
Learn moreRelated insights
InsightAugust 27, 2026 · 6 min read
OPPE Is More Than a Credentialing Requirement: Turning Peer Review Data Into Quality Improvement
Learn how healthcare organizations can use OPPE and peer review data beyond credentialing to identify trends, improve provider performance, and enhance patient safety.
Read more
InsightAugust 10, 2026 · 8 min read
Surgical Complication or Medical Error? How Peer Review Draws the Line
Learn how peer review distinguishes a surgical complication vs. medical error by evaluating clinical decisions, standard of care, and patient outcomes.
Read more
Case StudyAugust 10, 2026 · 6 min read
Surgical Complication vs. Medical Error: A Peer Review Case Study
Case Overview A 67-year-old patient underwent elective laparoscopic abdominal surgery for a condition that had not improved with conservative treatment. The preoperative evaluation supported the need for surgery, and the
Read more
Talk to a case manager
Have an urgent case?
Contact us today to discuss how QPS can support your organization. A case manager will respond within 24 hours.